消費選擇與產品責任英語對話

對話原文與翻譯

每句先給英文原句，下面一行是中文翻譯。想練口說時把譯文遮住，跟著音訊一句句複述。

1. Emma 0:00

   I'm torn between a cheaper laptop now and the premium model that should last much longer.

   我在現在買便宜筆電，和買應該能用更久的高階款之間很掙扎。

   Line 1
2. Tom 0:06

   Is lifespan the main difference, or does the expensive one also become much costlier to repair later?

   主要差異是壽命嗎？還是貴的那台日後維修也會貴很多？

   Line 2
3. Emma 0:12

   Both, because the premium model has better battery life while its parts are notoriously expensive.

   兩者都有，因為高階款電池續航更好，但它的零件出了名的昂貴。

   Line 3
4. Tom 0:19

   Then durability alone doesn't settle it, because long life can still hide expensive failures.

   那就不能只看耐用度下決定，因為壽命長也可能伴隨高額故障成本。

   Line 4
5. Emma 0:25

   Exactly, and I use my laptop daily for freelance work, so replacing a weak one early would also hurt.

   沒錯，而且我每天都要用筆電接案工作，所以太早汰換一台不耐用的也會很傷。

   Line 5
6. Tom 0:32

   How long do you normally keep a device before your work needs change enough to outgrow it?

   通常你一台設備會用多久，才會因為工作需求變化而不敷使用？

   Line 6
7. Emma 0:37

   Usually four or five years, which is why the premium one looks sensible at first.

   通常四到五年，所以高階款一開始看起來才會很合理。

   Line 7
8. Tom 0:43

   But if one repair in year three equals half a new budget model, the logic changes quickly.

   但如果第三年一次維修就等於半台新入門機，整個算盤就會很快改變。

   Line 8
9. Emma 0:48

   That's true, and repair forums say the premium version often has keyboard issues after heavy use.

   確實，而且維修論壇也說高階版在重度使用後常有鍵盤問題。

   Line 9
10. Tom 0:55

    That detail matters more than glossy marketing about build quality and professional image.

    這個細節比那些強調做工和專業形象的亮麗行銷更重要。

    Line 10
11. Emma 1:01

    A middle option exists, because last year's model is sturdier than the cheap one and easier to service.

    其實有中間方案，去年的機型比便宜款更耐用，也更容易維修。

    Line 11
12. Tom 1:08

    That sounds promising, since it focuses on value rather than on status or fear of compromise.

    這聽起來很有希望，因為它著眼的是價值，而不是面子或害怕妥協。

    Line 12
13. Emma 1:14

    If the battery health checks out and the warranty is solid, I'd probably choose that middle path.

    如果電池健康度過關、保固也夠扎實，我大概會選那條中間路線。

    Line 13
14. Tom 1:20

    And if those checks fail, you'll know the premium price isn't buying enough certainty to justify itself.

    而如果這些檢查沒過，你就會知道高價並沒有買到足夠的確定性，不足以合理化那個價格。

    Line 14
15. Emma 1:26

    Exactly, because I want measurable reliability rather than a beautiful machine that makes me anxious.

    正是如此，因為我要的是可衡量的可靠性，不是外觀漂亮但讓我焦慮的機器。

    Line 15
16. Tom 1:34

    Then compare failure costs instead of sticker prices, and the decision will get much clearer.

    那就別只比標價，改比故障成本，決策會清楚很多。

    Line 16

本篇的真人發音、逐句跟讀錄音與發音評分都在 EngTalk App 內。

本課重點單字

從本篇對話中挑出的實義詞，依它們在全部 500 篇對話裡出現的等級排序（越靠後等級出現的越優先）。已排除虛詞、專有名詞與數詞。

• lifespan /ˈlaɪfˌspæn/ noun

  壽命；使用期限

• costlier /ˈkɔstliər/ adjective

  costly的比較級；更昂貴的

• notoriously /noʊˈtɔriəsli/ adverb

  臭名昭著地；出了名地。

• durability /ˌdʊrəˈbɪləti/ noun

  耐用性

• outgrow /ˌaʊtˈɡroʊ/ verb

  長大而不再適用；超越

• equals /ˈikwəlz/ verb

  等於

• forums /ˈfɔrəmz/ noun

  論壇；討論區

• glossy /ˈɡlɔsi/ adjective

  光滑有光澤的

• image /ˈɪmɪdʒ/ noun

  圖像；形象

• year's /jɪrz/ noun

  一年的；該年度的

• sturdier /ˈstɝdiər/ adjective

  更結實的

• promising /ˈprɑməsɪŋ/ adjective, verb

  有前途的；正在承諾

同類對話推薦

• Green Enough to Believe? 16 · 2 分鐘
• Convenience Has a Data Price 16 · 2 分鐘
• At What Point Is Another Repair Unreasonable? 16 · 2 分鐘
• Hope Needs Evidence 16 · 2 分鐘