回顧經歷與修正判斷英語對話

對話原文與翻譯

每句先給英文原句，下面一行是中文翻譯。想練口說時把譯文遮住，跟著音訊一句句複述。

1. Tom 0:00

   After the launch failed, everyone blamed the vendor, but I think we ignored earlier warning signs.

   這次上線失敗後大家都怪廠商，但我覺得我們其實忽略了更早的警訊。

   Line 1
2. Emma 0:06

   Which warning feels most important now, the slipping timeline or the messy testing reports?

   你現在覺得最關鍵的警訊是哪個？進度一直滑，還是測試報告混亂？

   Line 2
3. Tom 0:12

   Probably the testing reports, because we kept calling them temporary and avoided another delay.

   應該是測試報告，因為我們一直把它當暫時狀況，並回避再延後。

   Line 3
4. Emma 0:18

   So the failure wasn't only missing information, since the team also softened what the information meant.

   所以失敗不只是資訊不足，而是團隊也淡化了那些資訊代表的意思。

   Line 4
5. Tom 0:24

   Yes, and I helped that happen by treating repeated minor bugs like separate accidents.

   是，而且我也有責任，因為我把反覆出現的小錯都當成彼此無關的偶發。

   Line 5
6. Emma 0:30

   What linked them in hindsight, a common module, the same patch, or a shared workaround?

   事後看，真正把它們串起來的是什麼？同一模組、同一補丁，還是共同權宜解法？

   Line 6
7. Tom 0:37

   It was the same workaround, and each quick patch bought two days while burying the deeper instability.

   是同一套權宜解法；每次快修都只多撐兩天，卻把更深層的不穩定埋起來。

   Line 7
8. Emma 0:43

   Then short-term relief taught the team to tolerate a pattern that should have triggered concern.

   那短期舒緩其實讓團隊習慣容忍一種本該觸發警戒的模式。

   Line 8
9. Tom 0:49

   Exactly, although I still wonder whether I'm being too harsh because the deadline pressure was real.

   沒錯，但我還是會想，我是不是太苛刻了，畢竟當時截止壓力真的很大。

   Line 9
10. Emma 0:55

    Pressure explains the choice, but it doesn't erase the pattern that the choice created.

    壓力能解釋當下選擇，但不能抹掉那個選擇後來形成的模式。

    Line 10
11. Tom 1:00

    Next time I want a rule that three occurrences of the same defect trigger a formal review instead of quiet optimism.

    下次我想設一條規則：同類缺陷出現三次，就必須正式檢討，而不是私下樂觀。

    Line 11
12. Emma 1:08

    That helps, though someone could still rename similar issues and claim they are unrelated.

    這有幫助，但還是可能有人改個名稱，就說那些問題彼此無關。

    Line 12
13. Tom 1:14

    Then the trigger should be repeated impact rather than repeated labels, so the pattern stays visible.

    那觸發條件應該看重複的影響，不是重複的標籤，這樣模式才看得見。

    Line 13
14. Emma 1:20

    And someone should own the risk publicly, because hidden acceptance is what let the drift continue.

    而且得有人公開承擔風險，因為正是風險被偷偷接受，偏移才會繼續。

    Line 14
15. Tom 1:26

    That would have forced us to name the tradeoff instead of pretending time bought certainty.

    那樣本來就會逼我們把取捨說清楚，而不是假裝拖時間就等於更確定。

    Line 15
16. Emma 1:31

    Then the failure becomes useful if it changes how your team defines temporary from now on.

    如果它能改變你們團隊往後怎麼定義『暫時』，這次失敗就有價值。

    Line 16

本篇的真人發音、逐句跟讀錄音與發音評分都在 EngTalk App 內。

本課重點單字

從本篇對話中挑出的實義詞，依它們在全部 500 篇對話裡出現的等級排序（越靠後等級出現的越優先）。已排除虛詞、專有名詞與數詞。

• vendor /ˈvɛndər/ noun

  供應商；賣方

• softened /ˈsɔfənd/ verb/adjective

  軟化了；緩和的

• bugs /bʌɡz/ noun

  bug的複數；程式缺陷；小蟲

• accidents /ˈæksədənts/ noun

  事故；意外事件（複數）

• hindsight /ˈhaɪndˌsaɪt/ noun

  事後認識；後見之明

• module /ˈmɑdʒul/ noun

  模組

• burying /ˈbɛriɪŋ/ verb

  bury的現在分詞；掩埋；埋藏

• instability /ˌɪnstəˈbɪləti/ noun

  不穩定

• taught /tɔt/ verb

  教過；教授了

• tolerate /ˈtɑləˌreɪt/ verb

  容忍；忍受

• occurrences /əˈkɝənsəz/ noun

  發生的事；出現次數。

• defect /ˈdifɛkt/ noun

  缺陷；故障

同類對話推薦

• Preparing for Travel Disruptions 16 · 2 分鐘
• When Good Intentions Miss the Mark 16 · 2 分鐘
• Support or Control? 16 · 2 分鐘
• Was It a Reasonable No? 16 · 2 分鐘