EngTalk App Icon
EngTalk by OSofts

B2 · Reviewing Experiences and Revising Judgments

Warnings We Chose Not to See

CEFR level:
B2
Sentences:
16
Duration:
2 min
Speakers:
Tom & Emma

"Warnings We Chose Not to See" is a B2-level English conversation about reviewing experiences and revising judgments, 16 lines long (about 2 minutes) between Tom & Emma. Read the full script below with the translation next to each line, then try speaking one of the roles out loud.

Dialogue script

Each entry shows the English sentence first, with the translation on the line below it. To practise speaking, cover the translation and repeat after the audio.

  1. Tom 0:00

    After the launch failed, everyone blamed the vendor, but I think we ignored earlier warning signs.

    Line 1
  2. Emma 0:06

    Which warning feels most important now, the slipping timeline or the messy testing reports?

    Line 2
  3. Tom 0:12

    Probably the testing reports, because we kept calling them temporary and avoided another delay.

    Line 3
  4. Emma 0:18

    So the failure wasn't only missing information, since the team also softened what the information meant.

    Line 4
  5. Tom 0:24

    Yes, and I helped that happen by treating repeated minor bugs like separate accidents.

    Line 5
  6. Emma 0:30

    What linked them in hindsight, a common module, the same patch, or a shared workaround?

    Line 6
  7. Tom 0:37

    It was the same workaround, and each quick patch bought two days while burying the deeper instability.

    Line 7
  8. Emma 0:43

    Then short-term relief taught the team to tolerate a pattern that should have triggered concern.

    Line 8
  9. Tom 0:49

    Exactly, although I still wonder whether I'm being too harsh because the deadline pressure was real.

    Line 9
  10. Emma 0:55

    Pressure explains the choice, but it doesn't erase the pattern that the choice created.

    Line 10
  11. Tom 1:00

    Next time I want a rule that three occurrences of the same defect trigger a formal review instead of quiet optimism.

    Line 11
  12. Emma 1:08

    That helps, though someone could still rename similar issues and claim they are unrelated.

    Line 12
  13. Tom 1:14

    Then the trigger should be repeated impact rather than repeated labels, so the pattern stays visible.

    Line 13
  14. Emma 1:20

    And someone should own the risk publicly, because hidden acceptance is what let the drift continue.

    Line 14
  15. Tom 1:26

    That would have forced us to name the tradeoff instead of pretending time bought certainty.

    Line 15
  16. Emma 1:31

    Then the failure becomes useful if it changes how your team defines temporary from now on.

    Line 16

Native audio, line-by-line recording and pronunciation scoring for this dialogue are in the EngTalk app.

Key vocabulary

Content words from this dialogue, ranked by the CEFR level at which they appear across the whole 500-dialogue library. Function words and proper nouns are excluded.

  • vendor /ˈvɛndər/ noun

    a person or company that sells goods or services

  • softened /ˈsɔfənd/ verb/adjective

    made or became softer or gentler

  • bugs /bʌɡz/ noun

    plural of bug; small insects or software flaws

  • accidents /ˈæksədənts/ noun

    unexpected events that cause damage or injury

  • hindsight /ˈhaɪndˌsaɪt/ noun

    understanding of an event after it has happened

  • module /ˈmɑdʒul/ noun

    a separate unit or component

  • burying /ˈbɛriɪŋ/ verb

    present participle of bury; placing underground or hiding from view

  • instability /ˌɪnstəˈbɪləti/ noun

    lack of steadiness or reliability

  • taught /tɔt/ verb

    past tense and past participle of teach

  • tolerate /ˈtɑləˌreɪt/ verb

    to accept or endure something unpleasant

  • occurrences /əˈkɝənsəz/ noun

    events or instances of something happening.

  • defect /ˈdifɛkt/ noun

    a fault or problem in something