協作與文化差異英語對話

對話原文與翻譯

每句先給英文原句，下面一行是中文翻譯。想練口說時把譯文遮住，跟著音訊一句句複述。

1. Emma 0:00

   In yesterday's meeting, everyone assumed Jia agreed because she stayed quiet, but later she raised major concerns.

   昨天會議裡大家因為 Jia 沉默就當她同意，但會後她提出了重大疑慮。

   Line 1
2. Tom 0:08

   Was she hesitant to speak, or did the meeting structure make silence the easiest option?

   她是不好意思開口，還是會議結構讓沉默成了最容易的選項？

   Line 2
3. Emma 0:13

   Probably both, because senior people were speaking quickly and the decision sounded half settled already.

   可能兩者都有，因為資深成員講得很快，而且決策聽起來像已經先定一半。

   Line 3
4. Tom 0:19

   Then silence didn't equal consent, since she may have had limited opportunity to join the conversation.

   那沉默就不等於同意，因為她可能根本沒有足夠機會加入討論。

   Line 4
5. Emma 0:25

   That's how I see it, although some people still say she should have interrupted if it mattered.

   我也是這樣看，但還是有人說如果真重要，她就該直接打斷。

   Line 5
6. Tom 0:31

   In theory maybe, but interruption feels very different across hierarchy, language confidence, and team norms.

   理論上也許是，但在階層、語言自信和團隊規範不同下，打斷別人感受差很多。

   Line 6
7. Emma 0:39

   Exactly, and if we keep rewarding speed, only the most comfortable voices will shape decisions.

   沒錯，如果我們持續獎勵速度，最後只會讓最自在發言的人主導決策。

   Line 7
8. Tom 0:45

   So what rule would separate real agreement from unspoken uncertainty in a fairer way?

   那要用什麼規則，才能更公平地把真正同意和沒說出口的不確定分開？

   Line 8
9. Emma 0:51

   We could end major topics with a round where each person is asked for concerns, not just quick approval.

   重大議題結尾可以加一輪逐一詢問：每個人說顧慮，不只是快問快答式同意。

   Line 9
10. Tom 0:58

    That would slow meetings somewhat, but it might prevent hidden objections from exploding later.

    這確實會讓會議稍慢，但可以避免隱藏反對意見之後一次爆開。

    Line 10
11. Emma 1:03

    Another idea is a short written comment window for people who think more clearly after the room quiets down.

    另一個做法是留一個短暫書面回饋窗，給那些在散會後思路更清楚的人。

    Line 11
12. Tom 1:10

    That helps only if the decision isn't treated as final the second everyone leaves the meeting.

    但前提是不能在大家一離開會議室就把決策視為最終定案，不然這招沒用。

    Line 12
13. Emma 1:16

    Then let's define a twenty-four-hour review window for non-urgent decisions before execution begins.

    那我們就在執行前，為非緊急決策訂一個二十四小時的檢視期吧。

    Line 13
14. Tom 1:23

    And we can mark truly urgent cases separately, so speed is chosen consciously rather than by habit.

    而且我們可以把真正緊急的案件另外標註，這樣追求速度就是有意識的選擇，不是習慣性反應。

    Line 14
15. Emma 1:29

    If we do both, silence becomes a cue to check rather than proof that everyone agrees.

    如果兩個都做到，沉默就會變成需要再確認的訊號，而不是大家都同意的證明。

    Line 15
16. Tom 1:36

    That's a much safer rule, especially in teams where confidence and status are unevenly distributed.

    這個規則安全得多，尤其是在自信程度和地位分布不平均的團隊裡。

    Line 16

本篇的真人發音、逐句跟讀錄音與發音評分都在 EngTalk App 內。

本課重點單字

從本篇對話中挑出的實義詞，依它們在全部 500 篇對話裡出現的等級排序（越靠後等級出現的越優先）。已排除虛詞、專有名詞與數詞。

• raised /reɪzd/ verb, adjective

  提高了的；撫養的

• settled /ˈsɛtəld/ adjective

  已解決的；安定的

• unspoken /ʌnˈspoʊkən/ adjective

  未說出口的；心照不宣的

• fairer /ˈfɛrɚ/ comparative adjective

  更公平的

• somewhat /ˈsʌmˌwʌt/ adverb

  有點；稍微

• objections /əbˈdʒɛkʃənz/ noun

  反對意見；異議。

• exploding /ɪkˈsploʊdɪŋ/ verb

  正在爆炸；激增

• comment /ˈkɑmɛnt/ noun

  評論；意見

• quiets /ˈkwaɪəts/ verb

  使安靜

• twenty-four-hour /ˈtwɛnti fɔr ˈaʊər/ adjective

  二十四小時的

• consciously /ˈkɑnʃəsli/ adverb

  有意識地，自覺地

• unevenly /ʌnˈivənli/ adverb

  不均勻地

同類對話推薦

• Directness Needs Framing 16 · 2 分鐘
• Efficiency for Whom? 16 · 2 分鐘
• When Almost Done Means Different Things 16 · 2 分鐘
• Keeping the Meaning, Not the Whole Package 16 · 2 分鐘