EngTalk App Icon
EngTalk by OSofts

B2 · Collaboration and Cultural Differences

Silence Is Not Consent

CEFR level:
B2
Sentences:
16
Duration:
2 min
Speakers:
Emma & Tom

"Silence Is Not Consent" is a B2-level English conversation about collaboration and cultural differences, 16 lines long (about 2 minutes) between Emma & Tom. Read the full script below with the translation next to each line, then try speaking one of the roles out loud.

Dialogue script

Each entry shows the English sentence first, with the translation on the line below it. To practise speaking, cover the translation and repeat after the audio.

  1. Emma 0:00

    In yesterday's meeting, everyone assumed Jia agreed because she stayed quiet, but later she raised major concerns.

    Line 1
  2. Tom 0:08

    Was she hesitant to speak, or did the meeting structure make silence the easiest option?

    Line 2
  3. Emma 0:13

    Probably both, because senior people were speaking quickly and the decision sounded half settled already.

    Line 3
  4. Tom 0:19

    Then silence didn't equal consent, since she may have had limited opportunity to join the conversation.

    Line 4
  5. Emma 0:25

    That's how I see it, although some people still say she should have interrupted if it mattered.

    Line 5
  6. Tom 0:31

    In theory maybe, but interruption feels very different across hierarchy, language confidence, and team norms.

    Line 6
  7. Emma 0:39

    Exactly, and if we keep rewarding speed, only the most comfortable voices will shape decisions.

    Line 7
  8. Tom 0:45

    So what rule would separate real agreement from unspoken uncertainty in a fairer way?

    Line 8
  9. Emma 0:51

    We could end major topics with a round where each person is asked for concerns, not just quick approval.

    Line 9
  10. Tom 0:58

    That would slow meetings somewhat, but it might prevent hidden objections from exploding later.

    Line 10
  11. Emma 1:03

    Another idea is a short written comment window for people who think more clearly after the room quiets down.

    Line 11
  12. Tom 1:10

    That helps only if the decision isn't treated as final the second everyone leaves the meeting.

    Line 12
  13. Emma 1:16

    Then let's define a twenty-four-hour review window for non-urgent decisions before execution begins.

    Line 13
  14. Tom 1:23

    And we can mark truly urgent cases separately, so speed is chosen consciously rather than by habit.

    Line 14
  15. Emma 1:29

    If we do both, silence becomes a cue to check rather than proof that everyone agrees.

    Line 15
  16. Tom 1:36

    That's a much safer rule, especially in teams where confidence and status are unevenly distributed.

    Line 16

Native audio, line-by-line recording and pronunciation scoring for this dialogue are in the EngTalk app.

Key vocabulary

Content words from this dialogue, ranked by the CEFR level at which they appear across the whole 500-dialogue library. Function words and proper nouns are excluded.

  • raised /reɪzd/ verb, adjective

    lifted, increased, or brought up

  • settled /ˈsɛtəld/ adjective

    resolved, calm, or established

  • unspoken /ʌnˈspoʊkən/ adjective

    understood without being said

  • fairer /ˈfɛrɚ/ comparative adjective

    more fair

  • somewhat /ˈsʌmˌwʌt/ adverb

    to a small or moderate degree

  • objections /əbˈdʒɛkʃənz/ noun

    reasons for disagreeing or opposing something.

  • exploding /ɪkˈsploʊdɪŋ/ verb

    bursting violently or increasing suddenly

  • comment /ˈkɑmɛnt/ noun

    a remark or written opinion

  • quiets /ˈkwaɪəts/ verb

    makes less noisy or calmer

  • twenty-four-hour /ˈtwɛnti fɔr ˈaʊər/ adjective

    lasting or using a full 24 hours

  • consciously /ˈkɑnʃəsli/ adverb

    with awareness; deliberately

  • unevenly /ʌnˈivənli/ adverb

    in an unequal or irregular way