訂閱、帳單與數位權益英語對話

對話原文與翻譯

每句先給英文原句，下面一行是中文翻譯。想練口說時把譯文遮住，跟著音訊一句句複述。

1. Tom 0:00

   My cloud note app updated its data policy, and now it says user content may support service improvements.

   我用的雲端筆記更新了資料政策，現在寫著使用者內容可能用於服務改進。

   Line 1
2. Emma 0:06

   Do they define that phrase clearly, or is it broad enough to hide several very different uses?

   他們有把這句話定義清楚嗎？還是寬到可以包進很多完全不同的用途？

   Line 2
3. Tom 0:13

   It's broad, which is why I'm uneasy, because my notes aren't secret yet they are still personal.

   範圍很廣，所以我才不安；我的筆記不算機密，但仍然很私人。

   Line 3
4. Emma 0:19

   Then the concern isn't paranoia, since the boundary of reuse has clearly become less defined.

   這不是多慮，因為可被再利用的邊界確實變得更模糊了。

   Line 4
5. Tom 0:26

   Exactly, but support only told me I could opt out of promotional emails, which misses the point entirely.

   沒錯，但客服只說我可以取消促銷郵件，完全沒回到重點。

   Line 5
6. Emma 0:33

   That reply suggests even they may not understand what users actually need clarified.

   那種回覆反而像是他們自己也不清楚，使用者到底需要被釐清什麼。

   Line 6
7. Tom 0:39

   I could stay, export everything, or keep the app only for low-stakes notes while I watch how they answer.

   我可以繼續用、全部匯出，或先把這個 App 只留給低風險筆記，再觀察他們怎麼回應。

   Line 7
8. Emma 0:45

   Segmenting your use may be the fastest short-term response if an immediate full switch would be chaotic.

   如果立刻全面搬家會很混亂，先分流使用可能是最快的短期做法。

   Line 8
9. Tom 0:53

   True, although splitting notes across apps can create a different kind of mess over time.

   是啦，但長期把筆記分散在多個 App，也可能累積另一種混亂。

   Line 9
10. Emma 0:58

    That's why the long-term decision should depend on whether the company answers your precise questions directly.

    所以長期要不要留下，應該看公司是否願意直接回答你的具體問題。

    Line 10
11. Tom 1:05

    I want to ask whether model training is included, whether opt-out exists, and how old data is treated.

    我想問：是否包含模型訓練、是否可選擇退出、以及舊資料會怎麼處理。

    Line 11
12. Emma 1:12

    Exactly, because if they won't answer those directly, the ambiguity itself becomes useful evidence.

    正是如此；如果這些都不肯正面回答，那種模糊本身就是重要證據。

    Line 12
13. Tom 1:19

    If the response stays vague, I'll export critical notebooks first and reduce my dependence gradually.

    如果回覆還是含糊，我會先匯出關鍵筆記本，再逐步降低依賴。

    Line 13
14. Emma 1:25

    And if they provide narrow, verifiable limits, you can decide with less speculation and more confidence.

    反過來說，若他們給出具體且可驗證的限制，你就能少猜測、多把握地做決定。

    Line 14
15. Tom 1:33

    I like that approach, because it treats uncertainty as something to manage instead of something to ignore.

    我喜歡這個方式，因為它把不確定性當成可管理的事，而不是假裝沒看到。

    Line 15
16. Emma 1:38

    Right, because trust never requires perfection, but it does require boundaries that users can understand.

    對，信任不必完美，但必須有使用者看得懂的邊界。

    Line 16

本篇的真人發音、逐句跟讀錄音與發音評分都在 EngTalk App 內。

本課重點單字

從本篇對話中挑出的實義詞，依它們在全部 500 篇對話裡出現的等級排序（越靠後等級出現的越優先）。已排除虛詞、專有名詞與數詞。

• secret /ˈsikrət/ noun

  秘密

• paranoia /ˌpærəˈnɔɪə/ noun

  偏執；多疑

• reuse /riˈjuz/ verb/noun

  重複使用；再利用

• opt /ɑpt/ verb

  選擇；挑選。

• promotional /prəˈmoʊʃənəl/ adjective

  促銷的；推廣的

• reply /rɪˈplaɪ/ verb

  回覆

• low-stakes /ˌloʊ ˈsteɪks/ adjective

  風險低的；利害關係小的

• segmenting /ˈsɛɡˌmɛntɪŋ/ noun

  分段；劃分

• mess /mɛs/ noun

  混亂；髒亂

• opt-out /ˈɑpt ˌaʊt/ noun

  退出選擇；選擇不參加。

• notebooks /ˈnoʊtˌbʊks/ noun

  筆記本；多本筆記本。

• verifiable /ˌvɛrəˈfaɪəbəl/ adjective

  可驗證的

同類對話推薦

• Negotiating an Unclear Trial Renewal 16 · 2 分鐘
• Seeking an Exit After a Core Feature Disappears 16 · 2 分鐘
• When Existing Customers Get Less for More 16 · 2 分鐘
• When Support Contradicts Itself 16 · 2 分鐘