旅行規劃與突發變化英語對話

對話原文與翻譯

每句先給英文原句，下面一行是中文翻譯。想練口說時把譯文遮住，跟著音訊一句句複述。

1. Emma 0:00

   Planning this trip with Chloe is getting tense because she counts every dollar and I need a decent bed.

   跟 Chloe 規劃這趟旅行越來越緊繃，因為她每一塊錢都精算，而我需要一張像樣的床。

   Line 1
2. Tom 0:06

   So the issue isn't just money, because your thresholds for what makes travel enjoyable are different.

   所以問題不只在錢，因為你們對「旅行要怎樣才舒服」的門檻不同。

   Line 2
3. Emma 0:12

   Exactly, since she can handle long bus rides and shared bathrooms while I get miserable quickly.

   正是這樣，她可以接受長途巴士和共用衛浴，但我很快就會痛苦到不行。

   Line 3
4. Tom 0:18

   Have you both said that plainly, or are the differences only leaking out through irritated comments?

   你們有把這件事直接說清楚嗎？還是差異只是透過帶情緒的碎念慢慢漏出來？

   Line 4
5. Emma 0:24

   Mostly through comments, which is making every option sound like a moral choice instead of a practical one.

   大多是透過碎念，結果每個選項聽起來都像道德選擇，不像實際選擇。

   Line 5
6. Tom 0:31

   Then separate shared costs from personal upgrades, or every comfort request will sound selfish.

   那就把共同支出和個人升級分開，不然每一個舒適需求都會聽起來像自私。

   Line 6
7. Emma 0:37

   I suggested that, but she worries it would split the trip into two unequal experiences.

   我有提過，但她擔心這樣會把旅行切成兩種不平等的體驗。

   Line 7
8. Tom 0:43

   It might a little, but forcing one standard could create even deeper resentment on both sides.

   可能多少會，但硬套單一標準，反而可能讓雙方累積更深的不滿。

   Line 8
9. Emma 0:49

   Another idea is a shorter trip with fewer moves, so a better hotel becomes affordable for both of us.

   另一個想法是把旅程縮短、減少移動，這樣兩個人都負擔得起更好的飯店。

   Line 9
10. Tom 0:56

    That's smart because it targets the actual constraint instead of arguing over who is too demanding.

    這很聰明，因為它瞄準的是真正的限制，而不是吵誰要求太多。

    Line 10
11. Emma 1:02

    She still says the destination list matters more than the room because we're outside most of the day.

    她還是覺得目的地清單比房間重要，因為我們一天大多時間都在外面。

    Line 11
12. Tom 1:08

    That can be true for her, but poor sleep changes how you experience every following day.

    對她來說也許是對的，但睡不好會改變你之後每一天的體驗品質。

    Line 12
13. Emma 1:14

    If we choose solid mid-range basics and pay individually for optional upgrades, would that be fair enough?

    如果我們先選穩定的中階基本款，再各自支付可選升級，這樣夠公平嗎？

    Line 13
14. Tom 1:21

    Probably, especially if you agree in advance which expenses stay shared and which remain personal.

    應該可以，尤其是你們先講好哪些費用共攤、哪些維持個人負擔。

    Line 14
15. Emma 1:27

    Then nobody has to pretend comfort and thrift are identical values.

    那就不用再假裝舒適和節省是完全一樣的價值了。

    Line 15
16. Tom 1:32

    Right, because good trip planning often means protecting the friendship from one-size-fits-all rules.

    對，因為好的旅行規劃往往是用來保護友情，不被一刀切規則消耗。

    Line 16

本篇的真人發音、逐句跟讀錄音與發音評分都在 EngTalk App 內。

本課重點單字

從本篇對話中挑出的實義詞，依它們在全部 500 篇對話裡出現的等級排序（越靠後等級出現的越優先）。已排除虛詞、專有名詞與數詞。

• thresholds /ˈθrɛʃˌhoʊldz/ noun

  閾值；門檻

• bathrooms /ˈbæθrumz/ noun

  衛生間；洗手間（複數）

• miserable /ˈmɪzərəbəl/ adjective

  痛苦的；糟糕的

• plainly /ˈpleɪnli/ adverb

  清楚地；明白地

• irritated /ˈɪrɪˌteɪtɪd/ adjective

  惱火的；煩躁的

• selfish /ˈsɛlfɪʃ/ adjective

  自私的

• unequal /ʌnˈikwəl/ adjective

  不平等的；不相等的

• targets /ˈtɑrɡəts/ noun/verb

  目標；針對

• constraint /kənˈstreɪnt/ noun

  約束，限制條件

• individually /ˌɪndəˈvɪdʒuəli/ adverb

  單獨地；逐個地

• thrift /θrɪft/ noun

  節儉；節約

• protecting /prəˈtɛktɪŋ/ verb

  正在保護

同類對話推薦

• One City or Three? 16 · 2 分鐘
• Paying for Reliability 16 · 2 分鐘
• What to Save First 16 · 2 分鐘
• Cheap Arrival, Expensive Uncertainty 16 · 2 分鐘