协作与文化差异英语对话

对话原文与翻译

每句先给英文原句，下面一行是中文翻译。想练口语时把译文遮住，跟着音频一句句复述。

1. Tom 0:00

   Our team likes blunt feedback, but the new designer looked shocked after yesterday's review.

   我们团队一直喜欢直接反馈，可昨天评审之后，新来的设计师明显被吓到了。

   Line 1
2. Emma 0:05

   Was the feedback inaccurate, or did the delivery feel normal to you but harsh to her?

   那些反馈是说错了，还是说对你们来说很正常，但对她来说太冲了？

   Line 2
3. Tom 0:11

   Probably the delivery, because people jumped straight to flaws in the name of efficiency.

   更像是表达方式，因为大家一上来就直接挑问题，说是为了效率。

   Line 3
4. Emma 0:16

   Efficiency can still feel personal when nobody frames the goal or acknowledges what already works.

   讲效率也还是可能让人觉得是在针对自己，尤其当没人先说明目标、也没人承认哪些部分已经做得不错。

   Line 4
5. Tom 0:23

   I used to think softening comments would waste time and blur the main issue.

   我以前一直觉得把话说软一点只会浪费时间，还会模糊真正的问题。

   Line 5
6. Emma 0:28

   Sometimes it can, but without context, directness may sound like rejection rather than precision.

   有时候确实会，不过如果没有上下文，直接往往听起来更像否定，而不是精准。

   Line 6
7. Tom 0:36

   She later said she couldn't tell whether the comments meant the concept was weak or she was.

   她后来跟我说，她当时甚至分不清那些评论是在说方案不好，还是在说她不行。

   Line 7
8. Emma 0:41

   That suggests a framing problem rather than a need to abandon honest critique altogether.

   这更像是缺少框架说明，而不是意味着你们要把坦率批评整个取消掉。

   Line 8
9. Tom 0:47

   So maybe we need a rule that each review starts with the goal before moving to gaps.

   那也许我们得立个规则，每次评审都先说清目标，再讲缺口。

   Line 9
10. Emma 0:52

    That would help, and one evidence-based strength could also show the work isn't being dismissed wholesale.

    这样会有帮助，而且再补上一条有依据的优点，也能让人知道不是整份工作都被否掉了。

    Line 10
11. Tom 0:59

    I'm wary of forced praise, because people can smell fake positivity very quickly.

    我还是有点担心被迫夸奖，因为那种假积极大家通常一下就能闻出来。

    Line 11
12. Emma 1:05

    Then keep it concrete, and name one part that works plus one part that needs revision.

    那就把表扬也说具体，点出一个真的有效的部分，再说一个需要调整的部分。

    Line 12
13. Tom 1:11

    If we explain the review style and add that structure, the new designer would probably adapt faster.

    如果我们把评审风格说清楚，再加上这个结构，新设计师大概会更快适应。

    Line 13
14. Emma 1:17

    And the team might write better comments too, because speed would stop excusing ambiguity.

    而且整个团队的反馈质量也可能会提高，因为“快”就不能再被拿来当含糊其辞的借口了。

    Line 14
15. Tom 1:23

    I'll raise it as a process issue instead of describing her as too sensitive for the culture.

    我会把这件事当成流程问题提出来，而不是说她太敏感不适合我们文化。

    Line 15
16. Emma 1:28

    Good, because that framing protects standards while admitting the culture may need translation.

    这样好，因为这种说法既保住了标准，也承认了文化本身可能需要被翻译一下。

    Line 16

本篇的真人发音、逐句跟读录音与发音评分都在 EngTalk App 内。

本课重点词汇

从本篇对话中挑出的实义词，按它们在全部 500 篇对话里出现的等级排序（越靠后等级出现的越优先）。已排除虚词、专有名词与数词。

• likes /laɪks/ verb

  喜欢；赞同

• blunt /blʌnt/ adjective

  直率的；钝的

• shocked /ʃɑkt/ adjective

  震惊的

• inaccurate /ɪnˈækjərət/ adjective

  不准确的

• flaws /flɔz/ noun

  缺点；瑕疵

• frames /freɪmz/ noun

  多个框架或边框

• acknowledges /ækˈnɑlɪdʒɪz/ verb

  承认；确认（第三人称单数）

• softening /ˈsɔfənɪŋ/ verb/noun

  软化；缓和

• directness /dəˈrɛktnəs/ noun

  直率；直接

• abandon /əˈbændən/ verb

  放弃；遗弃；抛弃

• critique /krɪˈtik/ noun

  评论；评析

• altogether /ˌɔltəˈɡɛðər/ adverb

  完全；总共；总而言之

同类对话推荐

• Efficiency for Whom? 16 · 2 分钟
• When Almost Done Means Different Things 16 · 2 分钟
• Silence Is Not Consent 16 · 2 分钟
• Keeping the Meaning, Not the Whole Package 16 · 2 分钟