EngTalk App Icon
EngTalk by OSofts

B2 · Consumer Choices and Product Responsibility

Green Enough to Believe?

CEFR level:
B2
Sentences:
16
Duration:
2 min
Speakers:
Tom & Emma

"Green Enough to Believe?" is a B2-level English conversation about consumer choices and product responsibility, 16 lines long (about 2 minutes) between Tom & Emma. Read the full script below with the translation next to each line, then try speaking one of the roles out loud.

Dialogue script

Each entry shows the English sentence first, with the translation on the line below it. To practise speaking, cover the translation and repeat after the audio.

  1. Tom 0:00

    This shampoo brand looks eco-friendly, but I can't tell whether the claims mean anything real.

    Line 1
  2. Emma 0:05

    What are they actually showing, concrete evidence or just words like natural and responsible?

    Line 2
  3. Tom 0:12

    Mostly the second, because the bottle is green, the website is polished, and the promises stay vague.

    Line 3
  4. Emma 0:18

    Then the design may be doing more work than the facts, which is always worth noticing.

    Line 4
  5. Tom 0:23

    They mention better sourcing, but there are no details about suppliers or independent checks.

    Line 5
  6. Emma 0:29

    That is a warning sign, because good intentions may exist while unverifiable claims still deserve caution.

    Line 6
  7. Tom 0:36

    Part of me thinks smaller brands deserve some benefit of the doubt since reporting can be expensive.

    Line 7
  8. Emma 0:42

    Maybe some, but not enough to justify paying a premium without basic transparency.

    Line 8
  9. Tom 0:48

    So what would count as enough evidence for an ordinary buyer who isn't doing a full investigation?

    Line 9
  10. Emma 0:53

    Specific ingredients, clear packaging information, and at least one independent standard would already help.

    Line 10
  11. Tom 1:01

    They do list ingredients, but the packaging section only says earth friendly without any measurable detail.

    Line 11
  12. Emma 1:07

    Then separate what seems credible from what is probably branding, because not every claim deserves equal trust.

    Line 12
  13. Tom 1:16

    If I still like the product, I can buy it without pretending I'm making a fully proven ethical choice.

    Line 13
  14. Emma 1:21

    Exactly, because liking something and believing every attached virtue claim are not the same act.

    Line 14
  15. Tom 1:28

    Unless they publish clearer data later, I'll treat the environmental message as partial rather than confirmed.

    Line 15
  16. Emma 1:34

    That's a strong position, since skepticism here protects values instead of weakening them.

    Line 16

Native audio, line-by-line recording and pronunciation scoring for this dialogue are in the EngTalk app.

Key vocabulary

Content words from this dialogue, ranked by the CEFR level at which they appear across the whole 500-dialogue library. Function words and proper nouns are excluded.

  • shampoo /ʃæmˈpu/ noun

    liquid used for washing hair

  • eco-friendly /ˌikoʊˈfrɛndli/ adjective

    not harmful to the environment

  • noticing /ˈnoʊtəsɪŋ/ verb

    becoming aware of something.

  • sourcing /ˈsɔrsɪŋ/ noun; present participle

    the process of finding or obtaining supplies

  • unverifiable /ˌʌnˈvɛrəˌfaɪəbəl/ adjective

    not able to be checked as true

  • brands /ˈbrændz/ noun

    plural of brand; types of products made by particular companies

  • buyer /ˈbaɪɚ/ noun

    a person who purchases goods or services

  • investigation /ɪnˌvɛstəˈɡeɪʃən/ noun

    a careful search for facts

  • earth /ɝθ/ noun

    the planet we live on; soil

  • branding /ˈbrændɪŋ/ noun

    the promotion of a particular product or company through advertising and distinctive design

  • proven /ˈpruvən/ adjective, verb

    shown to be true or effective

  • ethical /ˈɛθɪkəl/ adjective

    morally right and responsible