EngTalk App Icon
EngTalk by OSofts

B1 · Assignments, Projects and Presentations

Aligning Evaluation Criteria After Topic Disagreement

CEFR level:
B1
Sentences:
12
Duration:
1 min
Speakers:
Tom & Emma

"Aligning Evaluation Criteria After Topic Disagreement" is a B1-level English conversation about assignments, projects and presentations, 12 lines long (about 1 minute) between Tom & Emma. Read the full script below with the translation next to each line, then try speaking one of the roles out loud.

Dialogue script

Each entry shows the English sentence first, with the translation on the line below it. To practise speaking, cover the translation and repeat after the audio.

  1. Tom 0:00

    Our project team can't agree on topic, and discussion keeps looping.

    Line 1
  2. Emma 0:04

    Are you debating ideas without shared ways to judge them?

    Line 2
  3. Tom 0:08

    Exactly. Everyone argues from personal interest and experience.

    Line 3
  4. Emma 0:13

    Then agree on how to judge first, and choose topics second.

    Line 4
  5. Tom 0:17

    Some teammates think score tables feel too rigid for creativity.

    Line 5
  6. Emma 0:22

    A simple rubric guides creativity instead of killing it.

    Line 6
  7. Tom 0:26

    We'll score options by feasibility, data access, and presentation value.

    Line 7
  8. Emma 0:31

    Add team skill fit so execution risk is visible early.

    Line 8
  9. Tom 0:36

    I'll draft rubric tonight and run voting tomorrow morning.

    Line 9
  10. Emma 0:40

    Great, and keep top two topics as fallback choices.

    Line 10
  11. Tom 0:44

    If scores tie, we'll do a one-day mini prototype test.

    Line 11
  12. Emma 0:48

    I agree. Evidence-based choices reduce emotional deadlocks.

    Line 12

Native audio, line-by-line recording and pronunciation scoring for this dialogue are in the EngTalk app.

Key vocabulary

Content words from this dialogue, ranked by the CEFR level at which they appear across the whole 500-dialogue library. Function words and proper nouns are excluded.

  • debating /dɪˈbeɪtɪŋ/ verb

    present participle of debate; discussing opposing views

  • ways /weɪz/ noun plural

    methods, routes, or manners

  • judge /dʒʌdʒ/ verb

    to form an opinion about someone or something

  • exactly /ɪɡˈzæktli/ adverb

    precisely; in every detail

  • personal /ˈpɝsənəl/ adjective

    relating to one individual or private life

  • interest /ˈɪntrəst/ noun

    curiosity, concern, or money paid for borrowing

  • creativity /ˌkrieɪˈtɪvəti/ noun

    the ability to produce original ideas

  • access /ˈæksɛs/ noun

    the right or opportunity to use or enter something

  • value /ˈvælju/ noun

    worth, importance, or usefulness

  • skill /skɪl/ noun

    an ability learned through practice

  • evidence-based /ˈɛvədəns ˌbeɪst/ adjective

    guided by reliable evidence

  • emotional /ɪˈmoʊʃənəl/ adjective

    relating to or showing strong feelings