預算與共同分擔英語對話

對話原文與翻譯

每句先給英文原句，下面一行是中文翻譯。想練口說時把譯文遮住，跟著音訊一句句複述。

1. Emma 0:00

   I'm planning a reunion trip with friends, but our incomes differ so much that equal splitting feels off.

   我在規劃和朋友的重聚旅行，但大家收入差很多，平均分攤感覺不太對。

   Line 1
2. Tom 0:07

   Are you talking about essentials like lodging, or do the tensions also involve optional extras and nightlife?

   你指的是住宿這類必要開支，還是連可選加值和夜生活也會引發摩擦？

   Line 2
3. Emma 0:13

   Both, which is why it gets awkward, because equal splitting quietly favors the highest earners.

   兩種都有，所以才尷尬，因為平均分攤其實默默偏向高收入的人。

   Line 3
4. Tom 0:20

   Then your fairness standard may need to separate shared access from personal preference and luxury.

   那你的公平標準可能要把「共同可參與」和「個人偏好與奢華」分開。

   Line 4
5. Emma 0:25

   Exactly, since I want nobody excluded without making richer friends feel punished for earning more.

   正是，我不希望有人被排除，也不想讓收入高的朋友覺得自己被懲罰。

   Line 5
6. Tom 0:33

   Have you considered equal shares for the baseline while letting upgrades and extras stay individual?

   你有想過基礎項目均分，升級和額外消費各自負擔嗎？

   Line 6
7. Emma 0:38

   I have, but one friend says even the hotel choice itself already reflects class differences.

   有，但有位朋友說，連飯店選擇本身都已經反映階級差異。

   Line 7
8. Tom 0:45

   That's a real point, because the baseline can exclude people before optional spending even begins.

   那觀點很真實，因為如果基準太高，還沒到可選消費前就先把人排除掉了。

   Line 8
9. Emma 0:51

   Maybe we should choose a moderate shared plan first and let people add extras privately afterward.

   也許該先選一個中等共享方案，再讓大家事後私下加購自己想要的項目。

   Line 9
10. Tom 0:58

    That sounds workable, because participation stays common while comfort differences remain voluntary.

    這聽起來可行，因為共同參與能保留，同時舒適差異也維持自願。

    Line 10
11. Emma 1:04

    Another idea was contributions by percentage of income, but that would require financial disclosure some people hate.

    另一個想法是按收入比例分攤，但那需要揭露財務，很多人會很排斥。

    Line 11
12. Tom 1:12

    Right, and forced transparency can damage trust even when the moral logic behind it sounds fair.

    對，強制透明就算道德上說得通，也可能破壞彼此信任。

    Line 12
13. Emma 1:18

    If everyone can afford the baseline without stress, equal basics plus optional extras seems like the cleanest path.

    如果每個人都能無壓力負擔基礎方案，那基礎均分加可選自費，可能是最乾淨的做法。

    Line 13
14. Tom 1:26

    And if the baseline already strains someone, lower the plan before debating fairness theory any further.

    而且如果連基礎都讓某人吃力，就先下修方案，再談公平理論也不遲。

    Line 14
15. Emma 1:33

    Agreed, because I want the trip to reflect friendship rather than turn into a hidden spending contest.

    同意，我希望這趟旅行反映的是友誼，不是變成隱性的花費競賽。

    Line 15
16. Tom 1:39

    Then define fairness by access first, and let luxury stay where it belongs, which is a personal choice.

    那就先用「可參與性」定義公平，奢華回到它該在的位置，也就是個人選擇。

    Line 16

本篇的真人發音、逐句跟讀錄音與發音評分都在 EngTalk App 內。

本課重點單字

從本篇對話中挑出的實義詞，依它們在全部 500 篇對話裡出現的等級排序（越靠後等級出現的越優先）。已排除虛詞、專有名詞與數詞。

• reunion /riˈjunjən/ noun

  重聚；團圓

• incomes /ˈɪnˌkʌmz/ plural noun

  收入

• essentials /ɪˈsɛnʃəlz/ plural noun

  必需品；要點

• tensions /ˈtɛnʃənz/ noun

  緊張關係

• nightlife /ˈnaɪtˌlaɪf/ noun

  夜生活

• favors /ˈfeɪvɚz/ plural noun

  人情；幫忙

• earners /ˈɝnɚz/ plural noun

  掙錢者；收入者

• excluded /ɪkˈskludɪd/ verb

  排除了；未包括

• earning /ˈɝnɪŋ/ verb (present participle)

  正在賺取

• reflects /rɪˈflɛkts/ verb

  反映；反射；深思

• contributions /ˌkɑntrəˈbjuʃənz/ noun

  contribution的複數；各項貢獻或捐款

• percentage /pɚˈsɛntɪdʒ/ noun

  百分率；比例

同類對話推薦

• Ambition Needs a Safety Floor 16 · 2 分鐘
• Good Enough Fairness at Home 16 · 2 分鐘
• The Price of Paying Later 16 · 2 分鐘
• Clarity Before Resentment 16 · 2 分鐘